For your daily Scene and P2P releases

Star Wars Episodes I-VI Extended 720p FASM X264


Release Group: FASM
Release Name: Star Wars Episodes I-VI Extended 720p FASM X264
Release Date: June 11, 2009
Filename: Star_Wars_Episodes_I-VI_Extended_720p_FASM_X264
Source: HDTV
Size: 8.5 GB – DL DVD
Genre: Action | Adventure | Fantasy | Sci-Fi
Video format: 1000-1500kbps MPEG4 AVC HIGH PROFILE LEVEL 3.1
Video resolution: 1280×720
Video aspect ratio: TRUE 16:9 (no black bars)
Video frame rate: 25.000
Video Commpression Technique: FASM X264 VIDEO TECHNIQUE XI
Audio format: 200kbps 5.1 AAC HE
Audio Commpression Technique: FASM AAC AUDIO TECHNIQUE 3.0
Audio language: English
Subtitles: Polish (external)
Runtime: 2:10:31, 2:16:36, 2:10:12, 1:59:34, 2:02:06, 2:09:13
IMDB Rating: 8.8/10 (285439 votes)
Directed By: George Lucas
Starring: Mark Hammil, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher

Long time ago in the galaxy far far away…. FASM has brought to you the BOX SET of all 6 episodes of this epic Sci-fi Saga.
(Episodes IV-VI are extended Special Editions digitally remastered with added scenes).


WWWTrailerIMDBRTSample, NFO – Search (TPB)


Post your Star Wars Episodes I-VI Extended 720p FASM X264 torrent, download, quality, filesonic, fileserve, filejungle, bitshare, megashares, rapidshare, megaupload, uploadstation, hotfile, subtitles, samples, serial, keygen, and cracks here. Spamming and flaming will result in permban.
We are not responsible for the content of these comments.

38 comments

  1. stranded /

    holy crap this is awesome!

  2. mike /

    rapishare links please?

  3. rapid links anybody please?

  4. Burnton /

    this sucks..at first I thought finally Bluray rips of the orginal star wars….nope, just the ol’ hdtv rips….ah well, props for the complete set in one neways

  5. Anonymous /

    WTF is this shit? If you want nice quality get the german hd-tv rips or adywans avchd’s. This is cropped incorrect framerate bullshit.

    Christ, all 6 films on one DL-DVD? Its barely DVD quality let alone ‘HD’. Avoid at all costs.

  6. Nfolover /

    Where is the nfo again?

  7. Jorge /

    6 HD movies in 1 DL-DVD, wtf it’s wrong with this guy, bullshit.

  8. heres the nfo for people who dont want to wait 3hrs for imageshack to load
    http://pic.leech.it/i/9d247/ae593340infosw.jpg

    oh yeah and this rls is garbage

  9. Oboema /

    This must be cropped. How can AR be 16:9 when originally it was 2.35:1?

  10. Anonymous /

    @11:

    From the uploaders post at TPB:

    “Out of 9 pixels 1 is removed in both vertical and horizontal dimension…”

    “25% of the original screen is gone. There is nothing in those parts I would miss, so sorry you must live with it.”

    Nice effort by the uploader but why would anyone download anything that someone else has arbitrarily cropped? Might as well watch it full screen on TBS.

  11. yuck /

    I would definitely question the ones who posted this…not so much the fools who tried something stupid

  12. morpheus /

    you guys download everithing… this suckx

  13. bliblob /

    #
    11
    Oboema July 14th, 2009 at 7:36 pm or 19:36

    This must be cropped. How can AR be 16:9 when originally it was 2.35:1?

    2.35:1 is the original cinema aspect ratio, you dont get that at home
    well, you do, but only on the newest tvs built in that shape and size

  14. 8.5GB each, or 8.5GB for the entire 6 films? That would mean they’re “xvid” size…. I’ll stick with the DVDs for the time being. Thanks for uploading thou!

  15. George lucas /

    fagets all of u

  16. jhonny 5 /

    hotfile links please

  17. Yoda /

    Mpeg4 these are. Lame this is.

    Angry you will be if this you download.

  18. Mr Random /

    lol, i would avoid this bad bad encode if i were you.

    This is what i have:
    Star.Wars.Complete.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV

    Star.Wars.Episode.III.Revenge.Of.The.Sith.2005.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV Star.Wars.Episode.II.Attack.Of.The.Clones.2002.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV Star.Wars.Episode.VI.Return.Of.The.Jedi.1983.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV
    Star.Wars.Episode.V.The.Empire.Strikes.Back.1980.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV
    Star.Wars.Episode.IV.A.New.Hope.1977.720p.HDTV.x264.INTERNAL-hV

  19. I belive so many of you should start playing on stock market. You are just unbeliveable good at judging without seeing base only on owns premonitions. Such ability would make you rich people. What can I say more. I envy you….

  20. JohnDoe227 /

    Batman.Begins.2005.720p.nHD.x264-NhaNc3
    1306×544 (2.40:1)
    1.94 mbit/s
    2.20 GB

    The.Duchess.2008.BLUray.x264.chikezei
    1280 x 552 (2.35:1)
    1500 kbps
    1.32 GB

    -These both are way better than 1.36GB Xvids, but still 1/3 size of the proper release.
    -There is nothing wrong with these >2GB HD releases, exept _IF_ they are cropped.
    -Please STOP that cropping and continue with these great size/quality wise rips.

    -whining the aspect ration is okay, but saying something about the quality without watching samples first is stupid.

  21. Whiners /

    You people are such a bunch of whiners…the quality is awesome! Actually looks really good on my 42″ TV

  22. To finish this stupid dispute.
    Those are my releases and I am making them it fits my point of view.
    I understand many of you do not like cropped version, but I DO like them.
    Dont you guys ever heard about Degistubus non disputantum???
    Is there no place on scene for DIVERSITY?????
    Why everybody must do it in exactly the same way?????
    When communism found the way into your heads??? Yes COMMUNISM because in that system everybody must be equal, have the same things and act exactly the same.

    I do not want to do it in the same way like everybody else and I am posting the full explanation why I am doing what I am doing.

    I have never hide the fact about the video attributes and since now on I will make some corrections that even the noobs would understand what they are downloading.

    You have the right to complain about the quality. You have the right to do not like cropping, but dont be the children and first see before you judge.
    After all, sceptisism is the greatest enemy of PROGRESS.

  23. Blah! /

    You can argue all you want facham, 2.35 it’s not 1.778 period. Once you pan & scan something part of what was shoot is no longer there and the DP vision get’s changed, that’s why it sucks. Also any decent player has the option to pan & scan on the fly, so why bother changing it?

    You just irreversible trash part of the frame and looses overall quality while doing it due to the fact that you’re stretching the the whole thing to make it fit.

    Thanks anyway for your effort

  24. BigHeadWeb /

    Facham, it’s “De gustibus non est disputandum”. And it means “there’s no accounting for taste”. In this case, yours.

    You can be as diverse as you like. But you haven’t reframed any shots so that they work better. You’re not a cinematographer. I’d argue that it’s actually worse than Pan & Scan, since you have apparently made no effort to centre any of action. Your cropping is completely arbitrary. If you like it, great. Hell, some people like to eat cockroaches. Just be aware that it may not be palatable to the majority.

    And for the record, all you’ve done is release some movies. It’s not a political movement or great jump in social progress. Get over yourself.

  25. Bigheado,
    “De gustibus non est disputandum” in proper translation means “The taste should not be discussable”.

    Yes I am not the cinematographer, but apparently you have no idea when and why 16:9 has become the industrial standard. Go read Wikipedia before you will start the disscussion.

    You are right that some people like to eat cockroaches, but so many more do not like to eat caviar, never tasting it ….

    And I was not talking about POLITIC. I was talking about MENTALITY. Pure soviet man mentality…

    Blah: You are not correct thinking that doing it your way and using decent Player for removing the borders increases quality. Actually it is just the opposite. Just look by yourself.
    http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/9317
    Your mistake is because you do not see the whole picture. We usually do not watch the movies in original resolution. Our monitors have the resolution much bigger and in Full screen the picture is zoomed and the picture is blurred.
    I have carefully studied all aspects of video quality and choose the best for cropped image.

  26. JohnDoe227 /

    Better quality still won’t bring back the missing image.

    Have you considered using also mono sound? Or cutting the framerate to half 12fps? With these modifications you could easily increase the so called image quality.

  27. JohnDoe227:
    You are right, better quality won`t bring back the missing image, but I do prefer quality and I do not care for missing image. Why can`t you understand that??? Do I force you to download my work?? Do I try to convince others to do it my way??? Do I hide the info about it??? NO!!!!, but still you want to convert me.

    I really do not understand all of you. Why this anger??? Why this hate???
    For someone who would like to be different…
    For someone who do not want to make another the same release…

    Can someone explain this to me???

  28. just watched ep v /

    brilliant thankyou i’m converted a size of dvd rip with so much more

  29. gonzo /

    “25% of the original screen is gone. There is nothing in those parts I would miss, so sorry you must live with it.”

    LOL, a real film lover.

    @fachman:
    you are asking why people dont like this?
    you are not serious i hope.
    1. cutting something out of an artists work IS hateful. besides its pretty obsolete, we are not in the 80 when all tv channels crop everything to fullscreen, there is an EVOLUTION in technic and perception. nobody wants to go back to the stoneage.
    2.this is obviously a work of an amateur (not fachman=german for a pro). no sane person would take a 720p resolution with your bitrate, BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE MUD.
    3.dont bitch about individuality. you castrated it with you castrating artwork or like terry gilliam once said “have a little respect for what you’re pirating!”

  30. gonzo:
    I am not asking why people do not like this, because I understand it very well. I am asking why some people do not tolerate diversity.

    As for other things:
    1. And who are you exactly to be the speaker for the artists???
    2. And who are you exactly to say who is sane and who is not???
    3. Well you are right, I have cropped it with my cropping artwork, BUT I did it with a big respect to filmmakers, using industrial standards of which you have obviously have very little idea.

  31. Thank you /

    fachman, ignore these bitches. Not a single one of them has ever released anything themselves… All they do is bitch and moan even when it’s free, because that is what the youth (and some adults) of today have become. A bunch of whiny bitches. They seem to feel better about themselves when complaining and arguing anonymously on the internet for some reason (lack of confidence in the real world maybe?).

    I for one would like to thank you for your effort. I don’t mind the missing 25%! Looks great!

  32. space sploob:
    Fact is not the opinion. Its the description of the things happen in reality and the fact is that here on this forum majority opposes my work, while on others just the opposite, but I never force anyone to like my work.
    The fact also is that many people dont like caviar never tasting it :)

    Thank you:
    Dont worry, I rather enjoy it :)

  33. flick /

    so your from germany, maybe this guide will help you a little doing proper rips with a better per-pixel quality rate: http://encodingwissen.de/

    just admit it, the pic looks like sh!t because your resolution is way too high for the bitrate.
    there is a reason why they are encoding rules, to maintain a certain quality.
    and you wasted even more space with the 5.1 audio.

    but every “artist” deserves his audience. and you even found one @35 who will get anything, as long as its free?! peasant.

    please spare from this horrible cropping amateur atempts in the future.
    thanks.

  34. flick:
    Well if I would have used this guide then I would have agree with you that the pic would look like shit with this bitrate. Someone has put a lot of work in this instruction, (which I admire), but does not have a clue how to efficiently use the low bitrate. Unfortunatelly for you which I doubt even tested my work, I am using myself developed commpression method and the quality is not so bad. Of course it could be better, but we must wait for Bluray release, to achieve Matrix Trilogy level.

    Apparently my work is not for you, because my audience requests for cropping and this is what I will do, so please spare yourself the time and do not download my releases. There are plenty of noncropped with your desired bitrate level releases. Pleasure yourself with your taste and do not tell others how their taste should look like, because if you do you will treat them like peasants, who are not allowed to have their own taste, but instead should copy their masters. Ok, boss???

  35. fachman /

    I take back everything I said. These encodes I did are actually crap. Sorry all.

  36. Well, dont worry, you will learn how to do it properly and how to find a decent girlfriend also. Just a tip. Do not pretend you are someone you are not. Girls really dont like it…